ရဲရင့္
(ခ) ကိုသန္း စိုး(ခ) ကိုသစ္လြင္ ရဲ့ ကေနဒါမွာ ေနေနရတဲ့ အေျခေနေတြ ကို
ေမးလာတဲ့ မိတ္ေဆြ ရဲေဘာ္မ်ား ရဲ့ အေမး ေတြ ကို က်ေနာ္ ့အျမင္ သေဘာ ထားေတြ
မေျပာေနေတာ့ဘဲ့၊ ကေနဒီယန္ တေယာက္ ေရးခဲ့တဲ့ ေအာက္ ေဖၚျပပါ ပိုစ္ ကို
ဖတ္ၾကည့္ လိုက္ ၾကပါလို ့ဘဲ့....လက္တို ့လမ္းညြန္း ေပးပါရေစဗ်ာ။
(စာၾကြင္း အေနႏွင့္ ေပါ့။ ကေနဒါမွာ နားလည္မွဳ ့ႏွင့္ ေနေန ရတယ္ ဆို တဲ့ အေနထားကိုက နားလည္ ေအာင္ နဲနဲ ရွင္းျပေပးထားခ်င္တာပါ။ နာလည္မူ ့ႏွင့္ ေနေနရတာ ဆိုတာက တျခား ေနထိုင္ခြင့္ အေနထားေတြထက္ အလြန္ ကို နိပ့္နိုပ့္ က်က်ေနရ တယ္ ဆိုတာ ကို သိထားေစခ်င္တာပါ။ နားလည္ မူ ့ႏွင့္ ေနေနရတယ္ ဆို တာမ်ိဳး က ဘာေတြဘဲ့ျဖစ္ျဖစ္ တလ တခါ လူဝင္မူ ့ၾကီးၾကပ့္ေရး ကဖြင့္ ထားတဲ့ ေနရာသူတို ့လာဘို ့ေခၚထားတဲ့ ေနရာ ကို သြားျပီး မျဖစ္မေန ကို လက္မွတ္ထိုး အေၾကာင္းၾကားျပီးေနေနရတာ ကို ေျပာတာပါ။ တခါေလာက္ ပ်က္ကြက္တာ တို ့ေနာက္ က်တာတို ့ျဖစ္ခဲ့ရင္ ေတာင္ ခ်က္ျခင္းဖမ္းခ်ဳပ့္တာ ေတြ၊ ျပန္ပို ့တာ ေတြ လုပ့္တတ္ၾကပါတယ္။ ကိုသစ္ ကိုယ္ တိုင္လည္း ဒီလိုအျဖစ္မ်ိဳး၊ အေတြ ့ၾကံဳ မ်ိဳး ကို သူ ့ဘက္က ခ်ိဳ ့ယြင္းခ်က္ မဟုတ္ဘဲၾကံဳခဲ့ရဘူးပါတယ္။အထိမ္းသိမ္းေတာင္ ခံခဲ့ရဘူးပါတယ္။ အဲ လို အေျခေနမ်ိဳး ကေနမွ တဆင့္ တက္ျပီး ေတာ့ ဒုကၡသည္ ခံယူတာတို ့၊ တရာဝင္ ေနထိုင္ခြင့္ ရွိသူအျဖစ္ ေလွ်ာက္ထားတာတို ့(PR) ၊ ႏိုင္ငံသားအျဖစ္ ခံယူႏိုင္မူ ့တို ့ဆိုတဲ့ လူဝင္မူ ့ အဆင့္ ေတြ အဆင့္ ဆင့္ ရွိေနၾကတာပါ။
ေနာက္ေအာက္ ေဖၚျပပါပိုစ္မွာ ပါတဲ့ အလုပ့္လက္မဲ့ (he was unemployed) ဆိုတာက သူ ကေနဒါ ဘက္ကို အေမရိကားကေန ထြက္ လာတဲ့ အစဦးပိုင္းက အခ်ိန္ေတြပါ ၊ ကေနဒါ အစိုးရကလည္း တရာဝင္ အလုပ့္လုပ့္ခြင့္ မေပးေသးတဲ့အခ်ိန္ေတြမွာ ဒီေဖၚျပပါေဆာင္းပါးကို ေရးတဲ့အခ်ိန္မွာ အလုပ့္လက္မဲ့ ျဖစ္ခဲ့တာ ကို ေျပာထားတာပါ။ အခု ့လက္ရွိ အခ်ိန္မွာ ေတာ့ ကိုသစ္ ဟာ ကေနဒါႏိုင္ငံ ေအာ္တာရီယို ျပည္နယ္ရဲ့ ဖုန္း ကုပ႑ီ တခု ့ျဖစ္တဲ့ (BELL Company) ကြ်မ္း က်င္သူ အလုပ့္သမားအျဖစ္ ၁၀ စုႏွစ္ တခု ့ေက်ာ္ ကို လုပ့္ခဲ့တဲ့ အေတြ ့ၾကံဳရွိ လုပ့္သက္ရွိေနတဲ့ ကြ်မ္း က်င္ သူ ျဖစ္ အသက္ ေမြး ေနသူ ျဖစ္ေနပါျပီ။ က်န္တာေတြ ကို ေတာ့ ကိုယ့္ ဘာသာ ကိုယ္ ဆက္ဖတ္ၾကည့္ ၾကပါလို ့သာ တိုက္တြန္းလိုက္ပါရေစဗ်ာ။)
ေအာင္မိုး(ကေနဒါ)
_________________________________
National Post:
Hijacker likely in Canada for good
By Stewart Bell
Thursday, June 28, 2007
A Burmese pro-democracy activist who hijacked an airliner and held 50 passengers hostage has lost a court challenge against Canadian immigration authorities who want to deport him for terrorism.
Than Soe had argued he was not a terrorist because he did not intend to harm anyone when he hijacked a Burma Airways flight in 1989 and forced it to land in Thailand, but the Federal Court dismissed his case.
Despite his legal win, there appears to be little chance the convicted hijacker, who entered Canada illegally in 2003, will be deported any time soon because of the Burmese military junta's abysmal human rights record.
The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees says Mr. Soe, also known as Ye Yint and Thit Lwin, faces torture or indefinite detention in Burma for his role in the hijacking and pro-democracy activism.
Mr. Soe admits he hijacked the airliner, held hostages and demanded, among other things, the release of Burmese political prisoners. But he fears he will be tortured if Canada sends him home.
The case has become the latest terrorism-related challenge to Canada's refugee system. Canadian immigration policies make it difficult to deport even known terrorists to countries where they might be mistreated.
In October, 1989, Mr. Soe and another student named Ye Thi Ha hijacked a Fokker-28 passenger plane shortly after it left the Burmese town of Mergui for the capital Rangoon. They ordered the pilot to divert the plane to U-Tapao, Thailand.
Upon landing, they released the 30 oldest and youngest passengers but held the remaining 50 as hostages and reportedly threatened to blow the plane up with grenades unless Burma agreed to release all its political prisoners.
The hostages were eventually released and Mr. Soe surrendered to Thai authorities. Twenty-two at the time of the hijacking, Mr. Soe was sentenced to six years imprisonment. He was released after 2½ years, pardoned by the Thai government and made his way to the United States on a scholarship. From there he fled to Canada.
The Immigration and Refugee Board in 2004 declared him inadmissible due to his past connections to terrorism and a deportation order was issued, but Mr. Soe appealed to Stockwell Day, the Minister of Public Safety, to let him stay on the grounds that his presence in Canada would not be detrimental to the national interest.
The President of the Canada Border Services Agency recommended against the amnesty, writing in a briefing note that "Mr. Soe did commit a terrorist act. He did hijack a plane and people could have been injured or killed. This fact cannot be ignored.
"Mr. Soe has been upfront and honest about his hijacking. He presently does not appear to be a danger to Canadian society; however, his presence in Canada clearly goes against our national interest. Canada should not harbour individuals who had admitted to committing terrorist acts."
He added that there was no compelling reason to grant Mr. Soe refugee status because he was unemployed, had no family in Canada and he could request to return to Thailand, where he had been pardoned.
Mr. Day accepted the CBSA's recommendation on March 27, 2006, and denied the appeal. But Mr. Soe challenged the Minister in court and on April 30, 2007, Justice Michael Phelan tossed out the decision, saying Mr. Day had failed to consider the UNHCR's report.
"For all these reasons, the application for judicial review is allowed, the Minister's decision is quashed and the matter is remitted to the Minister for re-determination," the judge wrote.
A separate legal challenge heard by a different judge ended in the government's favour on Tuesday when Justice Michel Shore upheld an IRB decision that found Mr. Soe inadmissible to Canada for terrorism. Mr. Soe will now likely undergo an assessment to determine whether he faces a risk if Canada returns him to Burma.
Also called Myanmar, Burma is ruled by a military junta that suppresses all dissent and opposition with brute force. Nobel Prize winner Aung San Suu Kyi, who leads the...
မူရင္းလင္း(ခ္) ကေတာ့
(စာၾကြင္း အေနႏွင့္ ေပါ့။ ကေနဒါမွာ နားလည္မွဳ ့ႏွင့္ ေနေန ရတယ္ ဆို တဲ့ အေနထားကိုက နားလည္ ေအာင္ နဲနဲ ရွင္းျပေပးထားခ်င္တာပါ။ နာလည္မူ ့ႏွင့္ ေနေနရတာ ဆိုတာက တျခား ေနထိုင္ခြင့္ အေနထားေတြထက္ အလြန္ ကို နိပ့္နိုပ့္ က်က်ေနရ တယ္ ဆိုတာ ကို သိထားေစခ်င္တာပါ။ နားလည္ မူ ့ႏွင့္ ေနေနရတယ္ ဆို တာမ်ိဳး က ဘာေတြဘဲ့ျဖစ္ျဖစ္ တလ တခါ လူဝင္မူ ့ၾကီးၾကပ့္ေရး ကဖြင့္ ထားတဲ့ ေနရာသူတို ့လာဘို ့ေခၚထားတဲ့ ေနရာ ကို သြားျပီး မျဖစ္မေန ကို လက္မွတ္ထိုး အေၾကာင္းၾကားျပီးေနေနရတာ ကို ေျပာတာပါ။ တခါေလာက္ ပ်က္ကြက္တာ တို ့ေနာက္ က်တာတို ့ျဖစ္ခဲ့ရင္ ေတာင္ ခ်က္ျခင္းဖမ္းခ်ဳပ့္တာ ေတြ၊ ျပန္ပို ့တာ ေတြ လုပ့္တတ္ၾကပါတယ္။ ကိုသစ္ ကိုယ္ တိုင္လည္း ဒီလိုအျဖစ္မ်ိဳး၊ အေတြ ့ၾကံဳ မ်ိဳး ကို သူ ့ဘက္က ခ်ိဳ ့ယြင္းခ်က္ မဟုတ္ဘဲၾကံဳခဲ့ရဘူးပါတယ္။အထိမ္းသိမ္းေတာင္ ခံခဲ့ရဘူးပါတယ္။ အဲ လို အေျခေနမ်ိဳး ကေနမွ တဆင့္ တက္ျပီး ေတာ့ ဒုကၡသည္ ခံယူတာတို ့၊ တရာဝင္ ေနထိုင္ခြင့္ ရွိသူအျဖစ္ ေလွ်ာက္ထားတာတို ့(PR) ၊ ႏိုင္ငံသားအျဖစ္ ခံယူႏိုင္မူ ့တို ့ဆိုတဲ့ လူဝင္မူ ့ အဆင့္ ေတြ အဆင့္ ဆင့္ ရွိေနၾကတာပါ။
ေနာက္ေအာက္ ေဖၚျပပါပိုစ္မွာ ပါတဲ့ အလုပ့္လက္မဲ့ (he was unemployed) ဆိုတာက သူ ကေနဒါ ဘက္ကို အေမရိကားကေန ထြက္ လာတဲ့ အစဦးပိုင္းက အခ်ိန္ေတြပါ ၊ ကေနဒါ အစိုးရကလည္း တရာဝင္ အလုပ့္လုပ့္ခြင့္ မေပးေသးတဲ့အခ်ိန္ေတြမွာ ဒီေဖၚျပပါေဆာင္းပါးကို ေရးတဲ့အခ်ိန္မွာ အလုပ့္လက္မဲ့ ျဖစ္ခဲ့တာ ကို ေျပာထားတာပါ။ အခု ့လက္ရွိ အခ်ိန္မွာ ေတာ့ ကိုသစ္ ဟာ ကေနဒါႏိုင္ငံ ေအာ္တာရီယို ျပည္နယ္ရဲ့ ဖုန္း ကုပ႑ီ တခု ့ျဖစ္တဲ့ (BELL Company) ကြ်မ္း က်င္သူ အလုပ့္သမားအျဖစ္ ၁၀ စုႏွစ္ တခု ့ေက်ာ္ ကို လုပ့္ခဲ့တဲ့ အေတြ ့ၾကံဳရွိ လုပ့္သက္ရွိေနတဲ့ ကြ်မ္း က်င္ သူ ျဖစ္ အသက္ ေမြး ေနသူ ျဖစ္ေနပါျပီ။ က်န္တာေတြ ကို ေတာ့ ကိုယ့္ ဘာသာ ကိုယ္ ဆက္ဖတ္ၾကည့္ ၾကပါလို ့သာ တိုက္တြန္းလိုက္ပါရေစဗ်ာ။)
ေအာင္မိုး(ကေနဒါ)
_________________________________
National Post:
Hijacker likely in Canada for good
By Stewart Bell
Thursday, June 28, 2007
A Burmese pro-democracy activist who hijacked an airliner and held 50 passengers hostage has lost a court challenge against Canadian immigration authorities who want to deport him for terrorism.
Than Soe had argued he was not a terrorist because he did not intend to harm anyone when he hijacked a Burma Airways flight in 1989 and forced it to land in Thailand, but the Federal Court dismissed his case.
Despite his legal win, there appears to be little chance the convicted hijacker, who entered Canada illegally in 2003, will be deported any time soon because of the Burmese military junta's abysmal human rights record.
The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees says Mr. Soe, also known as Ye Yint and Thit Lwin, faces torture or indefinite detention in Burma for his role in the hijacking and pro-democracy activism.
Mr. Soe admits he hijacked the airliner, held hostages and demanded, among other things, the release of Burmese political prisoners. But he fears he will be tortured if Canada sends him home.
The case has become the latest terrorism-related challenge to Canada's refugee system. Canadian immigration policies make it difficult to deport even known terrorists to countries where they might be mistreated.
In October, 1989, Mr. Soe and another student named Ye Thi Ha hijacked a Fokker-28 passenger plane shortly after it left the Burmese town of Mergui for the capital Rangoon. They ordered the pilot to divert the plane to U-Tapao, Thailand.
Upon landing, they released the 30 oldest and youngest passengers but held the remaining 50 as hostages and reportedly threatened to blow the plane up with grenades unless Burma agreed to release all its political prisoners.
The hostages were eventually released and Mr. Soe surrendered to Thai authorities. Twenty-two at the time of the hijacking, Mr. Soe was sentenced to six years imprisonment. He was released after 2½ years, pardoned by the Thai government and made his way to the United States on a scholarship. From there he fled to Canada.
The Immigration and Refugee Board in 2004 declared him inadmissible due to his past connections to terrorism and a deportation order was issued, but Mr. Soe appealed to Stockwell Day, the Minister of Public Safety, to let him stay on the grounds that his presence in Canada would not be detrimental to the national interest.
The President of the Canada Border Services Agency recommended against the amnesty, writing in a briefing note that "Mr. Soe did commit a terrorist act. He did hijack a plane and people could have been injured or killed. This fact cannot be ignored.
"Mr. Soe has been upfront and honest about his hijacking. He presently does not appear to be a danger to Canadian society; however, his presence in Canada clearly goes against our national interest. Canada should not harbour individuals who had admitted to committing terrorist acts."
He added that there was no compelling reason to grant Mr. Soe refugee status because he was unemployed, had no family in Canada and he could request to return to Thailand, where he had been pardoned.
Mr. Day accepted the CBSA's recommendation on March 27, 2006, and denied the appeal. But Mr. Soe challenged the Minister in court and on April 30, 2007, Justice Michael Phelan tossed out the decision, saying Mr. Day had failed to consider the UNHCR's report.
"For all these reasons, the application for judicial review is allowed, the Minister's decision is quashed and the matter is remitted to the Minister for re-determination," the judge wrote.
A separate legal challenge heard by a different judge ended in the government's favour on Tuesday when Justice Michel Shore upheld an IRB decision that found Mr. Soe inadmissible to Canada for terrorism. Mr. Soe will now likely undergo an assessment to determine whether he faces a risk if Canada returns him to Burma.
Also called Myanmar, Burma is ruled by a military junta that suppresses all dissent and opposition with brute force. Nobel Prize winner Aung San Suu Kyi, who leads the...
မူရင္းလင္း(ခ္) ကေတာ့
Learn
about whistleblowers and the new Federal Accountability ActOpen Letter
to the Prime MinisterOpen Letter to Senators'Deadly Silence'
david-kilgour.com
No comments:
Post a Comment